Legal Opinion

Collum v. Neuhoff

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1974No. 18246PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

This is an injunction suit involving building restrictions in a residential area in Dallas. The trial court, sitting without a jury, concluded that appellants W. Harold Collum and wife had violated restrictive covenants affecting their home property and granted to appellee Henry Neuhoff, Jr. the permanent injunction he sought restraining appellants from completing a swimming pool and fence and requiring them to remove the swimming pool and fence from the portion of their property which is within 25 feet of the rear boundary line of their tract. We affirm.

The parties’…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cowling v. ColliganTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hooper v. LottmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. City of Deer Park v. State ex rel. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1954
  4. MacDonald v. PainterTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Greenway Parks Home Owners Ass'n v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Frey v. DeCordova Bend Estates Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Franz v. Katy Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  3. Giles v. Cardenas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  4. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. v. Capital Outdoors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  5. Tarrant Appraisal District v. Colonial Country ClubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API