Raul Rosales v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Circuit Judge:
The question to be decided is whether, in a diversity case, a federal district court is authorized within its discretion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(b) to order a bifurcated trial on the issues of liability and damages, despite an alleged state-law policy applicable in state courts that in personal injury cases the issues are so intertwined that such bifurcated trials are impermissible. We hold that this mode of trying a dispute in federal court, specifically authorized by the federal rules of civil procedure, is primarily procedural in nature and that federal procedural law…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jaclyn G. Oulds, an Individual v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co., an Iowa Corporation and Principal Financial Group, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Ellis v. Weasler Engineering Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Virginia Nester v. Textron, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Charles J. Randall v. Arabian American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.