Haub v. Leggett
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
The action is to recover fifteen hundred dollars, alleged to be due plaintiff for services rendered and food supplied to the decedent in her lifetime. The evidence showed the following facts: Plaintiff presented to the defendants, as executors of the estate of said decedent, a claim for said sum for allowance as a claim against said estate. The executors allowed it for only five hundred dollars, and endorsed thereon and signed a statement to that effect. Thereupon the plaintiff presented the claim, so endorsed, to the judge…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Commercial Bank of San Luis Obispo v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Estate of CrosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Morton v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Selna v. SelnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Faias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- In Re Estate of BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Estate of RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- In Re Estate of HellierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. SandbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.