In Re Estate of Bell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing the payment by an administratrix of an allowed claim against the estate of her decedent. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorig-An, J.
This appeal is from an order made in the Estate of Bell, deceased, directing the appellant, adminis tratrix, to pay an allowed claim of the California Safe Deposit and Trust Company, an insolvent corporation (hereafter to be designated The Trust Company or bank) against said estate.
This and another appeal taken by the administratrix from an order of the superior court dismissing her petition in intervention, filed in the insolvency proceeding against said trust company—People etc. v. California Safe Deposit and Trust Company, respondent Teresa Bell, as administratrix, etc., intervener and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Haub v. LeggettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Richardson v. DissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by27 opinions
- Construction Protective Services, Inc. v. Tig Specialty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Hilton v. McNittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- CPS v. TIG Specialty Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Barreiro v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.