Legal Opinion

McArthur v. Ryals

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1926No. 5069PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The substance of the petition is set out in the foregoing statement of facts. The defendant demurred to the petition, on the grounds that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the relief sought; that the claim is out of date; that the plaintiffs are seeking indirectly to do what they can not do directly; that if they have a claim it is for specific performance, and the facts alleged are stale, and the law will not maintain their claim in an *417action of specific performance, for the reason that something like forty years has elapsed; and an attempt to recover by way of ejectment and accounting can…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Munroe v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Scaife v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Anderson v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Ryals v. LindsaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Thompson v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Paul v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API