Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Higginbotham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1932No. 8526PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. It has been held by this court that “Where a debtor conveyed, by an instrument in the form of a deed, real and personal property, and included in the conveyance a statement that the grantee agreed to pay a certain debt which the grantor owed, and the grantee received such deed and the property conveyed thereby, and the grantor became insolvent, the holder of a note of the grantor for such debt, or a part thereof, upon its becoming due and remaining unpaid, could file an equitable proceeding, with proper parties, to enforce the payment of such debt by the grantee;” also, that where a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. DeNieff v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Morgan v. ArgardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Union City Realty & Trust Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Vizard v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. McRitchie v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alropa Corporation v. PomeranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Somers v. AvantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Lunsford v. KerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Pinckney v. WeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Manget Foundation, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API