Legal Opinion

Solis v. Brookover Ranch Feedyard, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 2000No. 82,298PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

Claimant Juventino Solis, in this workers compensation appeal, sought the cost for repairs to a prosthesis which had been provided by the employer based upon a work-related injury. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company/The Hartford (Hartford) denied responsibility claiming the employer’s new insurance carrier, Kansas Livestock Association (KLA), would be responsible because the damage resulted from a new accident. The Workers Compensation Board (Board) concluded that ongoing repairs resulting from normal wear and tear did not constitute a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. In Re the Marriage of KillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Stephenson v. Sugar Creek Packing & Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Demars v. Rickel Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Board of Education of Unified School District No. 443 v. Kansas State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  2. Dees v. MARION-FLORENCE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  3. Stinemetz v. Kansas Health Policy AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  4. Anguiano v. Larry's Electrical Contracting L.L.CCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  5. Perez v. National Beef Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API