Legal Opinion

Stinemetz v. Kansas Health Policy Authority

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 4, 2011No. 105,366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

Mary D. Stinemetz, a Kansas citizen and a practicing Jehovah’s Witness, needs a liver transplant, yet her religious beliefs prohibit blood transfusions. There is a medically accepted technique, known as a bloodless liver transplant, in which liver transplant surgery can be performed without a blood transfusion, although many medical facilities do not consider this technique to be the safest procedure. Cost is not the issue. The available evidence indicates that the bloodless technique is less expensive than a procedure involving blood transfusions. There is no medical facility in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitchell County v. Matthew Hoover ZimmermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Kan. City in Kan. v. City of Mission WoodsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  3. Polk v. BuntingDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API