Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Sugar Creek Packing & Hartford Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1992No. 67,056PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

This is an appeal by Debra Stephenson from the district court’s entry of judgment affirming the award made to her by the administrative law judge in the Division of Workers Compensation. Appellees are Sugar Creek Packing, Stephenson’s employer, and Hartford Insurance Company, the insurance carrier (collectively referred to as Sugar Creek). Stephenson challenges the constitutionality of K.S.A. 1991 Supp. 44-510d(a)(23), which provides that compensation for “repetitive use conditions occurring in opposite upper extremities” shall be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Thompson v. KFB InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Injured Workers of Kansas v. FranklinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  4. Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. State v. DenneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API