Legal Opinion

Coffman v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 27, 2002No. 88,944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knudson, J.:

The respondent, State Self-Insurance Fund (Fund), appeals from a review and modification award finding Larry Coffman to be permanently totally disabled. The issues on appeal are whether there is substantial competent evidence to sup*62port the Workers Compensation Board (Board) finding of a change in Coffman’s physical condition supporting a modification of his previous award and, in the alternative, whether the Fund should be estopped to deny Coffman is permanently totally disabled.

We affirm the Board’s decision because a change in the claimant’s physical condition was supported by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Inland Container Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Griffin v. Dale Willey Pontiac-Cadillac-GMC Truck, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. Turon State Bank v. BozarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Frontier Ditch Co. v. Chief Engineer of the Division of Water ResourcesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Gile v. Associated Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  2. Church of God in Christ, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Emmanuel Church of God in ChristCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. Harder v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  4. State v. ParryCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. ParryCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API