Amos v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Petition for prohibition brought under section 999a, Penal Code, after motion to set aside an information pursuant to section 995, Penal Code, had been denied. The charge was bookmaking (Pen. Code, § 337a, subds. 1 and 2) and the motion was based upon the ground that defendant had not been legally committed by a magistrate. The problem presented is whether an attorney may act as a committing magistrate conducting a preliminary hearing in a criminal case after he has qualified pursuant to stipulation that he act in the particular proceeding as a judge pro tempore of a municipal court.
Petitioner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. BriteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Blyew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- People v. CrespiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Thurston v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. HaskettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Burris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.