Legal Opinion
In Re Gould
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 25, 1961No. Crim. 7815PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, J. pro tem. *
Contemner, Charles Gould, was committed to jail for five days by respondent court for wilful violation of its order. In the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in his behalf, it is alleged that his imprisonment is illegal and void, “in that said commitment does not show that said Charles Gould had knowledge of the support orders referred to, and further, does not affirmatively show that John Leslie Goddard, a Superior Court Commissioner, was acting as judge pro-tem in the matter. ...” The return of Peter J. Pitehess, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, and the reply to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. FlannellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Phillips v. Superior Court of Kern Cty.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Raiden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Killpatrick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. DellesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Moss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Reliable Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Koshak v. MalekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.