Legal Opinion
Forrester v. Daniels
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 22, 2010No. 10-985PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.
I, Petitioner April Forrester, individually and as a representative of all similarly situated voter-citizens of Arkansas, brings the instant original action challenging the sufficiency and validity of the proposed ballot title for a proposed constitutional amendment, identified as Issue No. 2, which is currently set to be voted upon by the citizens of this state at the November 2, 2010 general election.1 Petitioner requests injunctive relief and also seeks a writ |2of mandamus against Respondent Charlie Daniels, in his official capacity as Arkansas’s Secretary of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chaney v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Becker v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- First National Bank of DeWitt v. CruthisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Hanley v. Arkansas State Claims CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richardson v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Trujillo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Forrester v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Stephanie Potter Barrett v. John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
- Pritchett v. SpicerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.