Legal Opinion
In Re Condemnation by the City of Minneapolis of Certain Lands
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 16, 2001No. C5-99-1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.
In this eminent domain action, the City of Minneapolis (City) acquired title to and possession of property belonging to Joseph E. Commers Limited Partnership (respondent) through a statutory quick take procedure. We are asked to determine if the City owes interest at the rate set for judgments (judgment interest) to respondent on funds the City deposited with the court incidental to its quick take of respondent’s property. The district court denied respondent’s request for judgment interest because it found that the deposited funds, although not requested…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Warren v. First Division of St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Ford Motor Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- In Re Estate of JanecekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Fine v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority of St. Paul v. LambrechtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re Condemnation by the City of Minneapolis of Certain LandsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001