Legal Opinion
Mason v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 22, 2002No. C4-02-673PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
On appeal from an order denying his postconviction challenge to a restitution order, appellant Oscar James Mason argues that the postconviction court (a) erred in reserving the restitution issue at sentencing, (b) erred in issuing its restitution order after sentencing, and (c) misinformed him about the proper procedure for challenging a restitution order. Because Mason did not request a hearing within 30 days after receiving notice of the restitution amount requested, as required by Minn.Stat. § 611A.045, subd. 3(b) (2000), we affirm.
FACTS
In April 2000, Oscar…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Kozisek v. BrighamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Kelly, Jr. v. FurlongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- In Re Condemnation by the City of Minneapolis of Certain LandsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MeredykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re the Welfare of M.R.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Wayne Brian ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.