COBALLES v. Spokane County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Siddoway, A.C.J.
¶1 CherryAnn Coballes seeks to appeal a superior court decision affirming Spokane County’s determination that her dog, Gunnar, is a dangerous dog. We hold that a party appealing a dangerous dog declaration in superior court is not entitled to a second appeal as a matter of right in the Court of Appeals. We grant leave to Ms. Coballes to submit a motion for discretionary review under RAP 2.3(d) in lieu of her attempted appeal of right.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 On a morning in September 2010, Emmalin C., age 3, was visiting the home of CherryAnn Coballes when she…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bridle Trails Community Club v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cave Properties v. City Of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Board of Industrial Insurance AppealsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- City Of Seattle, Resps v. American Healthcare Services, Inc., Et Ano, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Dept Of L&i, Resp v. Board Of Industrial Ins Appeals, DefsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Michael E. Murray v. Dept. Of L & I, State Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017