Legal Opinion

COBALLES v. Spokane County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 26, 2012No. 29970-8-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Siddoway, A.C.J.

¶1 CherryAnn Coballes seeks to appeal a superior court decision affirming Spokane County’s determination that her dog, Gunnar, is a dangerous dog. We hold that a party appealing a dangerous dog declaration in superior court is not entitled to a second appeal as a matter of right in the Court of Appeals. We grant leave to Ms. Coballes to submit a motion for discretionary review under RAP 2.3(d) in lieu of her attempted appeal of right.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 On a morning in September 2010, Emmalin C., age 3, was visiting the home of CherryAnn Coballes when she…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bridle Trails Community Club v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  2. Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Malted Mousse, Inc. v. SteinmetzWashington Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cave Properties v. City Of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Department of Labor & Industries v. Board of Industrial Insurance AppealsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. City Of Seattle, Resps v. American Healthcare Services, Inc., Et Ano, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Dept Of L&i, Resp v. Board Of Industrial Ins Appeals, DefsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Michael E. Murray v. Dept. Of L & I, State Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API