Legal Opinion

Cave Properties v. City Of Bainbridge Island

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 11, 2017No. 49073-1-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxa, A.C.J.

¶1 Cave Properties and Marcia Wicktom (collectively Cave) appeal the superior court’s dismissal of an action in which Cave asserted both a petition under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW, and a petition for a writ of review. Cave’s action challenged the approval by the City of Bainbridge Island’s city council of a “latecomer reimbursement agreement,” which generally allows a developer who installs a water system to obtain reimbursement from other persons who later use that system. The approved agreement required Cave to reimburse John and Alice Tawresey if Cave…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Norcon Builders, LLC v. GMP Homes VG, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. James v. County of KitsapWashington Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chicago Title Insurance v. State RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
  2. Chicago Title Insurance, V State RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
  3. Leonard Carpenter Dewitt v. Kevin William HannanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Phyllis Farrell v. Friends Of JimmyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Pioneer Square Hotel Company & Aph Corporation v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API