Legal Opinion

Malted Mousse, Inc. v. Steinmetz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2003No. 73120-9PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

79 P.3d 1154 (2003)

150 Wash.2d 518

MALTED MOUSSE, INC., a Washington corporation, Petitioner,

v.

Michael A. STEINMETZ, Respondent.

No. 73120-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued September 9, 2003.

Decided November 13, 2003.

Martin Burns, Law Offices of McFerran & Helsdon, Tacoma, for Petitioner.

Michael A. Steinmetz, Mesa, AZ, for Respondent.

SANDERS, J.

This case requires us to address whether the trial de novo appeal process from mandatory arbitration under chapter 7.06 RCW sufficiently protects the rights of small claimants who are aggrieved by an arbitrator's erroneous act. We hold it…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Pierce County Sheriff v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re DomingoWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Williams v. TilayeWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of DomingoWashington Supreme Court · 2005

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API