Malted Mousse, Inc. v. Steinmetz
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
79 P.3d 1154 (2003)
150 Wash.2d 518
MALTED MOUSSE, INC., a Washington corporation, Petitioner,
v.
Michael A. STEINMETZ, Respondent.
No. 73120-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued September 9, 2003.
Decided November 13, 2003.
Martin Burns, Law Offices of McFerran & Helsdon, Tacoma, for Petitioner.
Michael A. Steinmetz, Mesa, AZ, for Respondent.
SANDERS, J.
This case requires us to address whether the trial de novo appeal process from mandatory arbitration under chapter 7.06 RCW sufficiently protects the rights of small claimants who are aggrieved by an arbitrator's erroneous act. We hold it…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Pierce County Sheriff v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re DomingoWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Williams v. TilayeWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- In re the Personal Restraint of DomingoWashington Supreme Court · 2005
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.