Legal Opinion

Barton v. Ludy

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1938No. Sac. 5141PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The appellant in this case is a lessee of real estate and the respondent is the assignee of his colessee. The latter brought an action for partition of the leasehold interest and was awarded judgment. The appellant claims that the lease was made to him and his colessee as partners and is partnership property; that the title transferred by the assignment is subject to the interest of the partnership and that the respondent is not entitled to partition.

The property in controversy consists of 255 acres of laird in Glenn County and is part of one of the farms which was leased by Sarah E. Ludy to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Perelli-Minetti v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Beach v. FaustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Dimity v. DixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Kowalsky v. KimberlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Gilbert John Marino, Debtor. Placer Savings and Loan Association v. Edward M. Walsh, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Gilbert John MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Placer Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Walsh (In Re Marino)District Court, N.D. California · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API