United States v. New York City Omnibus Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BICKS, District Judge.
In this action by the United States of America for property damage to an army bus allegedly resulting from the negligent operation of defendant’s bus, defendant counterclaims for damage to its vehicle. Plaintiff moves to dismiss said counterclaim contending that the Court lacks jurisdiction to render an affirmative judgment against it on a counterclaim.
The Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346(b), confers jurisdiction on the District Court “of civil actions on claims against the United States, for money damages * * * for injury or loss of property * * * caused by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Munro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Dugan Bros.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. FrankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- United States v. Wilkes-Barre Transit Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956