Legal Opinion

Gill v. Parry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1921No. 16014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered April 29,1920, upon findings in favor of defendant, in an action for money paid, tried on the merits to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— C. B. Hosner and W. O. Hinkley each owned an undivided one-half interest in a garage in the city of Seattle. Hinkley, desiring to leave the city, employed respondent Cole, doing business as the Reliable Investment Company, to find a purchaser for his one-half interest. The appellant, Neal W. Gill, seeing in the newspapers an advertisement concerning the sale of this one-half interest, called at the office of the Investment Company for the purpose of investigating the proposition. There he first met with the defendant C. B. Parry, who was in the employment of the Investment Company, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lubin v. CowellWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Stone v. KnutzenWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Thosath v. Transport Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Thosath v. Transport Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API