State ex rel. Eder v. Searles
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of Jake Eder and Max Krause the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the district court for Washington county, the Honorable J. N. Searles, judge thereof, and the clerk of that court, to review contempt proceedings in that court wherein relators were fined $50 each.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Certiorari to the district court of Washington county to review its order adjudging the relators guilty of contempt.
1. In a proceeding in mandamus on the relation of the Attorney General the Four Lakes Rural Telephone Company, a copartnership, was directed to furnish one Henry Sullwold the same telephone facilities and service that it furnished others similarly situated. See State v. Four Lakes R. Tel. Co. supra, page 124, 169'N. W. 480. The relators Jake Eder and Max Krause are members of the copartnership, the former being designated president and the latter secretary. The company did not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Hurd v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- State ex rel. Hurd v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- In re MeggettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- In re FanningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Laff v. LaffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Campbell v. Motion Picture Machine OperatorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State ex rel. Sandquist v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.