Hurd v. Hurd
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Willis, J., requiring him to pay alimony and ordering that in the event of his refusal he be imprisoned.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action for divorce. Prior to April 10, 1895, the district court made its orders directing certain sums of money to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant for attorney’s fees and temporary alimony. The plaintiff paid a portion of the amount so ordered to be paid, but neglected and refused to pay the balance, so that, on the day named, there was due and unpaid by the terms *444of the orders the sum of $500; and on that day a motion was made on behalf of the defendant, based upon the affidavits of the defendant and her attorney, and all the records and files in the-case, for a peremptory order of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- State ex rel. Warfield v. BechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- State ex rel. Hurd v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Nash v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
3Cited by27 opinions
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. Onan (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Stanhope v. PrattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.