Legal Opinion

S. Rosenfeld Co. v. Gleed

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1921No. 23,322PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

Plaintiff is engaged in.the produce commission business in the city of New York. The defendant, Fred Gleed, is engaged in the same business at Lawrence, Kan., his son, Herbert Gleed, being manager. On August 19, 1919, Fred Gleed sent the following telegram to plaintiff:

“Have car fresh candled eggs storage packed firsts shipment Wednesday if you care to buy outright wire price net New York. If not do you care to handle on consignment state terms and amount draft I can draw.”

On the same day he received an answer instructing him to consign and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bequillard v. BartlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Christie v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Hoffmeier v. Kansas City-Leavenworth RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. City of Syracuse v. W. F. Reed & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Missouri Can Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Meneley v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Rowan v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Davidson v. DouglassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API