S. Rosenfeld Co. v. Gleed
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
Plaintiff is engaged in.the produce commission business in the city of New York. The defendant, Fred Gleed, is engaged in the same business at Lawrence, Kan., his son, Herbert Gleed, being manager. On August 19, 1919, Fred Gleed sent the following telegram to plaintiff:
“Have car fresh candled eggs storage packed firsts shipment Wednesday if you care to buy outright wire price net New York. If not do you care to handle on consignment state terms and amount draft I can draw.”
On the same day he received an answer instructing him to consign and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bequillard v. BartlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Christie v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Hoffmeier v. Kansas City-Leavenworth RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- City of Syracuse v. W. F. Reed & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Missouri Can Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- James v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Meneley v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Rowan v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Davidson v. DouglassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.