City of Syracuse v. W. F. Reed & Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Hamilton District Court. The opinion states the facts. Judgment for defendants, Reed & Co., at the January term, 1889. The plaintiff City brings the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
The city of Syracuse brought an action against W. F. Reed & Co. to recover $218.79. It was alleged that the defendants received from N. W. Harris & Co., of Chicago, $8,360, which was the proceeds of certain bonds of the city of Syracuse that had been sold in Chicago, and that the defendants had paid over only the sum of $8,141.02, and had refused to pay to the city the balance of the amount received, although payment thereof had been demanded. In the answer it was admitted that Syracuse was a city of the third class, and that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. McGill v. GerhardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Custer v. RoyseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- S. Rosenfeld Co. v. GleedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Mentze v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Samuels v. GreenspanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.