Legal Opinion

City of Syracuse v. W. F. Reed & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from, Hamilton District Court. The opinion states the facts. Judgment for defendants, Reed & Co., at the January term, 1889. The plaintiff City brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

The city of Syracuse brought an action against W. F. Reed & Co. to recover $218.79. It was alleged that the defendants received from N. W. Harris & Co., of Chicago, $8,360, which was the proceeds of certain bonds of the city of Syracuse that had been sold in Chicago, and that the defendants had paid over only the sum of $8,141.02, and had refused to pay to the city the balance of the amount received, although payment thereof had been demanded. In the answer it was admitted that Syracuse was a city of the third class, and that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McGill v. GerhardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Custer v. RoyseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. S. Rosenfeld Co. v. GleedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Mentze v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Samuels v. GreenspanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API