Legal Opinion

Mack v. Drummond Tobacco Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1896No. 6530PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J. .

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, 0.

In August, 1889, G-. H. Mack & Co. were tobacco dealers in tbe city of Omaha, Nebraska, and the Drummond Tobacco Company were tobacco dealers in the city of St. Louis, Missouri. On said date said parties entered into-an agreement, in words and figures as follows:

“G. H. Mach & Co., Omaha, Nebraska: We hereby appoint you our agent to sell our tobacco at such prices as we-may require and direct by our price cards as issued from time to time. Your compensation, until changed by us, inclusive of insurance and all other expenses, will be six cents per pound on sales of Natural Leaf and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Cordage Co. v. SimsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Fish v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Alpha Checkrower Co. v. David Bradley & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Arbuckle Bros. v. Gates & BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  4. Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Piper v. Oakland Motor Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API