Lytle v. State Dept. of Licensing
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.
— Howard Lytle appeals the Department of Licensing’s (DOL) revocation of his driver’s license under RCW 46.20.308 (the implied consent law) for his refusal to take a breath analysis test to determine his blood alcohol content. Mr. Lytle contends the DOL revocation hearing violated his due process rights because he was denied a meaningful opportunity to be heard. We agree.
The majority of the underlying facts are undisputed by *359the parties. Late in the evening of June 28, 1996, off-duty Spokane County Deputy Sheriff T. Greenfield heard a vehicle skid and observed the vehicle resting across both…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. StorhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StorhoffWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Gibson v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- State v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kempke v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Alforde v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Alforde v. State, Dept. of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Martin v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Weekly v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.