Legal Opinion
Kempke v. Kansas Department of Revenue
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided May 5, 2006No. 94,013PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
The Kansas Department of Revenue sought to suspend the driver s license of Bryan Eugene Kempke under the Kansas implied consent law, K.S.A. 8-1001 et seq. The Ellsworth County District Court held that the statutory scheme of the Kansas implied consent law was unconstitutional as applied to Kempke in that the law denied Kempke of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution for the reason that he was not permitted to subpoena a relevant witness to testify at his administrative hearing. The Kansas…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Hamlin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Bruch v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Creecy v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.