Legal Opinion

Oxford v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 1989No. 88-209PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is an automobile accident case. The appellant was seriously injured when his car collided with a truck driven by the appellee, Donald Hamilton, who was a dealer for Snap-On Tools Corporation. The jury found the appellant 90% negligent and Hamilton 10% negligent. Snap-On Tools had been dismissed as a party on a motion for summary judgment.

Oxford appeals, raising four issues. Finding his arguments meritless, we affirm the jury’s verdict.

Immediately after the accident, Oxford was taken to the emergency room. A blood alcohol test was ordered by the attending…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jim Halsey Co., Inc. v. BonarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Bussard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Simpson v. HurtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davasher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Allen v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Kramer v. J.I. Case Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. State v. RoperNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. McVay v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API