Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 19, 1982No. CR 81-132PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

We grant a rehearing on the issue of the doctor-patient privilege; and, finding no error was committed, affirm the conviction and sentence of Theodis Baker.

Theodis Baker, while in the Pulaski County jail, was treated for gonorrhea by the jail nurse. The trial court admitted into evidence the simple fact that he had been treated for gonorrhea. In our opinion in Baker v. State (May 24, 1982), we held this was error because Baker had “communicated” this information to the nurse and under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 28-1001, Rule 503 (b) (Repl. 1979), the information was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gruzen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Munn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Ragsdale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. National Benevolent Society v. BarkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Harlan v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Davasher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. State v. SypultSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Bussard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API