Legal Opinion

Mandel v. Great Lakes Oil Etc. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1957No. Civ. 5601PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff and appellant, Irwin H. Mandel, brought this action against defendants and respondents Great Lakes Oil and Chemical Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as Great Lakes) et al., to quiet title to a certain mining claim known as Triumph Number 1, consisting of uranium and other ore-bearing minerals. This claim was mainly superimposed over Number 1 and Number 5 of 10 such claims designated as ICergon Numbers 1 to 10 inclusive, previously located by defendants Jack Kerns and W. T. Wag-goner in 1954 on government lands in Kern County, at a time when said lands had been, for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Newhall v. SangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Noonan v. Caledonia Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. Ames Mining CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Freeman v. Affiliated Property CraftsmenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Millyard v. FausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Smith v. DalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API