Legal Opinion

White v. Ames Mining Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1960No. 8760PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Respondents brought this action to quiet title to certain unpatented lode mining claims, including Radiant Mines claims Nos. 103 to 108 inclusive, situate on the south side of Salmon River in Section 33, Township 24 North of Range 20 East of the Boise Meridian, in Mineral Hill Mining District in Lemhi County. Radiant Mining Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as respondent, after commencement of the action, became the assignee of the interests of the other respondents.

Appellant W. C. Ames cross-complained to quiet title to certain unpatented lode mining claims designated…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Washington State Sugar Co. v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pincock v. Pocatello Gold & Copper Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Zollinger v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Molstead v. Reliance National Life Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Big Lost River Irrigation District v. ZollingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Nelson v. EndersIdaho Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API