Legal Opinion

Smith v. Daly

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1960No. Civ. 6081PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Two actions in the superior court, number 70549 involving a quiet title action to five gypsite placer mining claims, and number 70138 for damages for breach of a contract, were consolidated for trial. During the course of the trial, action number 70138 was dismissed and the court proceeded with the trial of the quiet title action.

The principal question involved is whether defendants performed the necessary assessment work on said claim during the year July 1, 1956, to July 1, 1957, and before plaintiffs filed a claim thereto August 1,1957; whether these claims were open for relocation by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Thornton v. PhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Golden Giant Mining Co. v. HillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Anderson v. CaugheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Clarke v. MalloryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daly v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Daly v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Pepperdine v. KeysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Bates v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API