Midwest Guaranty Bank v. Guaranty Bank
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
BORMAN, District Judge.
Now before the Court is Plaintiff Midwest Guaranty Bank’s motion for prelimi nary injunction. The Court held an evi-dentiary hearing on May 27, 2003 and heard final oral argument on May 28, 2003. Having considered the entire record, and for the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. Specifically, pending a final trial on the merits. Defendant Guaranty Bank is hereby RESTRAINED and ENJOINED from using the mark GUARANTY BANK in conjunction with its banking and related…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Leary v. DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clt Logistics v. River West BrandsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Norsworthy v. BeardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Cooey v. TaftDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Tocco v. ToccoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- South Yuba River Citizens League v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.