Legal Opinion
Cooey v. Taft
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 28, 2006No. 2:04-cv-01156PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
FROST, District Judge.
Jeffrey Hill, a state prisoner sentenced to death by the State of Ohio, is a plaintiff in a civil rights action pending before this Court that challenges multiple facets of the lethal injection protocol used by the State of Ohio. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Hill’s emergency motion for a preliminary injunction, ie., a stay of execution. (Doc. #37.) For the reasons that follow, the Court finds the motion well taken. Thus, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the State of Ohio, and any person acting on its behalf,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nelson v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Dion R. McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Inc., Board of Education of the Public Schools of the City of Ann ArborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grayson v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
- Armstead v. BaldwinDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Candid Ventures LLC v. Nestlings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- In the Matter of the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Execution Protocol CasesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Multi-Color Corporation v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.