In re the Personal Restraint of Clark

¶17 (dissenting) — Steven Clark’s original judgment and sentence is invalid on its face, and the ex parte order modifying the judgment and sentence is also invalid on its face. As a result, Clark’s personal restraint *589petition is timely. Because the majority’s analysis to the contrary mischaracterizes the original judgment and sentence and the modification order, I dissent.

¶18 Under RCW 10.73.090(1) a prisoner is barred from filing a personal restraint petition to collaterally attack a judgment and sentence more than one year after the judgment becomes final unless it is invalid on its face.…