Legal Opinion
In Re Eaton
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 1988No. 54359-3PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodloe, J.
Petitioner Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming an Island County Superior Court order that required (1) DSHS to place respondent Daniel Eaton (Eaton) at a specific group home and (2) DSHS to pay for the placement. We reverse.
I
On October 2, 1985, Barbara Eaton filed a petition for alternative residential placement (ARP) under RCW 13.32A, Procedures for Families in Conflict, in Island County Superior Court. The petition was in regard to her son, Daniel Eaton, then 15 years old. DSHS was not a named party to the action.
On December…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Tommy P. v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Everett Concrete Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- R/L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Peninsula School District No. 401 v. Public School EmployeesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.