Harpster v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Prager, J.:
This is a postjudgment garnishment proceeding in which the judgment creditor seeks to attach the wages of the judgment debtor. The facts are not in dispute and are basically as follows: Some time prior to April 9, 1973, the plaintiff-appellant, Claude Harpster, obtained a judgment against the defendant, Harold L. Reynolds, in the amount of $1250. This garnishment proceeding was brought against Reynolds’s employer, Bruenger Truck Company, to garnishee Reynolds’s wages. We will refer to Bruenger Truck Company as the truck company or the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- Coastal Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. HutchinsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Phelps v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Anchorage Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Anchorage Westward HotelAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Salyers Auto Co. v. DeVoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co. v. ColterMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- LSF FRANCHISE REO I, LLC v. Emporia Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Coward v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Williams v. Community Drive-In Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- In Re PriceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.