Legal Opinion

London v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 2003No. CR 02-970PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. H. “Dub” Arnold, Chiefjustice.

Appellant Maurice London appeals his conviction of robbery from the Pulaski County Circuit Court. Following conviction, the jury imposed a sentence of twelve years to be served in the Arkansas Department of Correction. The sole issue before us is whether the trial court committed reversible error in handling appellant’s Batson objection. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). We find no reversible error and affirm.

Jerry Rush testified at trial that on August 3, 2001, as he walked outside of his home, appellant put a gun to Rush’s head and demanded money from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. MacKintrush v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Hinkston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Flowers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API