Legal Opinion

Holcombe v. Ginn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 25, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The questions here presented relate to the allocation as between capital and income of “deficiency” income taxes assessed by the commissioner of internal revenue upon *416"income” received during the years 1931, 1932, and 1934 by the trustees under the will of Edwin Ginn and of similar taxes to be hereafter assessed. An outline of the provisions of this will is set forth in the opinion of this court in Parkhurst v. Ginn, 228 Mass. 159, wherein directions were given on various matters to former trustees of this same trust.

So much of the taxes paid as are attributable to "capital gains” should be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helvering v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. v. SmietankaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Burnet v. WhitehouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Williams v. Inhabitants of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dumaine v. DumaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Edgecombe Bank & Trust Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Estate of BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Amerige v. GoddardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. SchwabAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API