Legal Opinion

Estate of Bixby

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1956No. Civ. No. 21319PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

140 Cal.App.2d 326 (1956)

Estate of FRED H. BIXBY, Deceased. DANA LATHAM, as Guardian, etc., Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

KATHARINE BIXBY HOTCHKIS et al., Contestants and Appellants; FRED H. BIXBY, JR., Respondent.

Civ. No. 21319.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Mar. 28, 1956.

Latham & Watkins, A. R. Kimbrough, Ira M. Price II and Richard F. Allen for Petitioner and Appellant.

Sherman Anderson, Lawler, Felix & Hall and William T. Coffin for Contestants and Appellants.

Fred H. Bixby, Jr., in pro. per., Blau, Shaw & Miller, Louis C. Blau, Joseph M. Shaw and Simon Miller for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. BabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Thomas v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. In Re the Estate of De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Murphy v. CrouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Noble v. BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Lemp v. KetoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Estate of ReichelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. In re the Estate of HollowayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  5. Estate of McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API