Legal Opinion
Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Research, Development & Technical Employees Union
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 4, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-11315-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”), brings this action against the Research, Development and Technical Employees Union (the “Union”), seeking declaratory judgment that the revocation of unrestricted access to a nuclear research facility is not an arbitrable grievance under the collective bargaining agreement MIT has with the Union, and asking the Court to enjoin the Union from arbitrating the unrestricted access revocation issue.
A. Procedural Posture
MIT commenced this action against the Union on July 19,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawrence v. Cenlar F.S.B.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Schuller v. Eastern Washington UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025
- United Government Security Officers of America International Union v. G4S Regulated Security Solutions a Division of G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020