Legal Opinion

Kucera v. Department of Transportation

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 2000No. 68428-6PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

Petitioners Department of Transportation, Washington State Ferries, Kitsap County, and the City of *203Bremerton seek relief from a preliminary injunction limiting the speed of a passenger ferry the Chinook, along a portion of its run pending compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW. We granted petitioners’ motion for direct discretionary review to consider whether the trial court properly granted injunctive relief pending compliance with SEPA.

We hold the trial court improperly disregarded the established prerequisites for issuance of a preliminary injunction…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Sierra Club v. John O. Marsh, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kucera v. State, Dept. of Transp.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. SuperValu, Inc. v. Department of LaborWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. SuperValu, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hoggatt v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. City of Selah v. Steve Owens and Janet OwensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API