Legal Opinion
The Continental Ins. v. The Equitable Trust Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
This action is brought by plaintiffs to recover upon
rescission because of the alleged misrepresentations claimed to have been made by defendant. The action is the result of the purchase by plaintiffs of certain bonds of the Green Star Steamship Corporation from the defendant. The complaint alleges four causes of action in which plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $66,776.41. This sum represents the purchase price of said bonds. The sufficiency of the complaint has been upheld. (127 Misc. 45; affd., 219 App. Div. 711.) The failure of plaintiffs to restore to the defendant the original bonds…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Continental Insurance v. MercadanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Zeltner v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Fenno v. PrimroseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- Chittenden v. San Domingo Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of DanielsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Romsa v. County ClerkWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Glassberg v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Saper v. National Bank of Far RockawayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942