Legal Opinion
Peisker v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1941No. 4614PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MABRY, Justice.
Appellant sought a declaratory judgment in his endeavor to recover certain taxes paid by him to appellee Unemployment Compensation Commission and to enjoin the Commission from' collecting from him any further tax. Appellee demurred to the petition, the demurrer was sustained and appellant appealed.
The provisions of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Chap. 1, Special Session Laws 1936, as amended by Chap. 129, Laws 1937, and Chap. 175, Laws 1939), which will hereinafter be referred to as the Compensation Act, enacted in conformity with the Federal Act, defines employers subject…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Reed v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Evco v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- NRA Special Contribution Fund v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Field Enterprises Educational Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.