Legal Opinion

State v. Fried

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1978No. 3548PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Convicted of trafficking in cocaine, defendant appeals. Issues listed in the docketing statement, but not briefed, are deemed abandoned. State v. Ortiz, 90 N.M. 319, 563 P.2d 113 (Ct.App.1977). Two issues are argued. They concern: (1) closing argument; and (2) the jury listening to a tape recording during its deliberations.

Closing argument

Defendant’s conviction is based on the sale of cocaine to an undercover agent on January 22, 1977 in Santa Fe. The agent identified defendant as the seller; the identification testimony was supported by a tape recording of telephone…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. State v. PolskyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. State v. RossNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. State v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. VialpandoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. FrazierWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WildgrubeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. DietzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API