Legal Opinion
State v. Ortiz
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 1977No. 2778PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Convicted of embezzlement contrary to § 40A-16-7, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6, 1972) defendant appeals asserting the trial court erred in: (1) not dismissing the indictment because it charged in the disjunctive and therefore did not give defendant sufficient notice; and, (2) not directing a verdict because of insufficient evidence. Issues listed in the docketing statement and not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned. State v. Vogenthaler, 89 N.M. 150, 548 P.2d 112 (Ct.App.1976).
On April 30,1976 two agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration, through an informant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. VogenthalerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. TantonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. TijerinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. ManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. ArandaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. GabaldonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.