Lang v. Lilley and Thurston Co.
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The respondents move to dismiss the appeal on the g’round that no proper transcript on appeal was filed within the time allowed by the rules of this court. The appeal is from the judgment only.
The facts upon which the motion to dismiss is based are that the appeal was taken in the manner provided in sections 941a, 941b, and 941c of the Code of Civil Procedure; that the transcript is printed and filed in this court in accord with our rules, and that no notice was given to the clerk to prepare a transcript on appeal and it was not prepared in the manner provided in sections 953a,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Cortelyou v. Imperial Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Clemens v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Nezik v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.