Legal Opinion

Nezik v. Cole

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1919No. Civ. No. 3018PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment, entered after default, awarding damages in the sum of $17,688 for personal injuries.

Within the time when an appeal may he taken appellants filed with the clerk of the court in which the judgment was entered a notice stating the appeal from the same and served a similar notice on the attorneys for the adverse party. They did not, however, within five days after service of the notice of appeal, file the undertaking, or, in lieu thereof, make the deposit of money with the clerk as required by sections 940 and 941 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and no waiver of the same…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Sturges v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Kittle v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Kohl v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lyon-Gray Lumber Co. v. Gibraltar Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Stubbs v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API