Legal Opinion

Clemens v. Gregg

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1917No. Civ. No. 1664PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Morrison, Dunne & Brobeek, and Edward Lynch, for Appellant Wellington Gregg, as Trustee, C. 0. Whittemore, Frank J. Solinsky, Mack & Green, and John B. Clayberg, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is an appeal by Wellington Gregg, Jr., as trustee, from an order of the superior court of Inyo County, made and entered on December 23,1914, which modified a decree made and entered on January 26, 1914, ordering the sale of certain mining property under the terms of a deed of trust executed by the defendant, Keane Wonder Mining Company.

Before proceeding to consider the merits of the controversy, we deem it the more orderly first to dispose of a motion made by the respondents other than the Keane Wonder Mining Company to dismiss the appeal.

The record before ns is entitled: “Clerk’s and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Dennis v. BintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Clay v. Hildebrand Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  5. Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. LindsayNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Kosturos v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Wood v. MesmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Koeberle v. CoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API